Sesame Street Ron Paul- One of These Things... on YouTube
Great vid but it left out other non-CFR candidates
Paul supporter comments are stupid to the point of scary...
Showing posts with label canditates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canditates. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Monday, October 29, 2007
My Candidate Update
As you know, if you know me or have been reading this, I've had to re-align my favorites for the 2008 election... a few times. As dirt surfaces, and as people say dumb things, I've had to keep re-analysing who will be the absolute best for the long-term best interests of America.
Right when finally I think my initial assessment of Tancredo being the best is solidified, he tries to bet his campaign on a baseball game. There's too much at stake for that. Maybe he just wanted some extra publicity, and to try to capture the hearts and minds of the Americans who don't have a clue (ie: the ones who care more about "reality TV" and celebrities doing dumb things than anything else). That took him down a notch in my book. He's still in the top three for me...
Hunter. He started as my number 3. He moved up to number 2 when I learned about Thompson's CFR ties. Thompson was dropped from the list. We can not afford to elect anyone with CFR ties. Hunter took the time to visit and speak at the Gathering of Eagles event. He made it clear we were at war with an ideology, and we could not afford to back down. He was a good speaker, and you could tell the issues were important to him, not just important to getting elected.
Thompson dropping from my list moved Huckabee up to number 3. Huckabee echoes the platforms of Tancredo and Hunter, so closely that I thought since he's the most popular of the underdogs he might be the best after all. Then some dirt surfaced. He's not my top pick for the absolute best, but he keeps saying the right things, and he's still in my top 3, if only because nobody else seems to be available...
Huckabee recently got an endorsement from Chuck Norris, on WorldNetDaily, and is still popular there.
So is another 9/11 possible?
Huckabee responds,
"There's almost an inevitability, not just a possibility. It will happen again. And it'll happen because we face an enemy that is not a nation-state that can be contained within borders and boundaries, because their war is not about borders and boundaries. Islamofascism is rooted in a theocratic Islamic jihadism that seeks to destroy and annihilate every last one of us. It wants to establish a complete Islamic theocracy across the world, and for that to happen it means our culture has to be completely snuffed out. There's no peaceful co-existence, there's no accommodation, there's no naïve nonsense that if we leave them alone they leave us alone. This is a war someone will win and someone will lose. Whoever perseveres and whoever has the strongest will, will in fact win, and that's why we can't give up."
He seems to have a good grasp of the situation, and his recent rise to front-runner status is encouraging, but I'm likely going to be keeping my fingers crossed for Hunter all the way. Huckabee might not be the cleanest, but he's not stupid either- and bottom line is, he's still better than the other front-runners... I hope that if he does manage to get in office, he'll choose Hunter (or even Tancredo) as a solid VP.
Right when finally I think my initial assessment of Tancredo being the best is solidified, he tries to bet his campaign on a baseball game. There's too much at stake for that. Maybe he just wanted some extra publicity, and to try to capture the hearts and minds of the Americans who don't have a clue (ie: the ones who care more about "reality TV" and celebrities doing dumb things than anything else). That took him down a notch in my book. He's still in the top three for me...
Hunter. He started as my number 3. He moved up to number 2 when I learned about Thompson's CFR ties. Thompson was dropped from the list. We can not afford to elect anyone with CFR ties. Hunter took the time to visit and speak at the Gathering of Eagles event. He made it clear we were at war with an ideology, and we could not afford to back down. He was a good speaker, and you could tell the issues were important to him, not just important to getting elected.
Thompson dropping from my list moved Huckabee up to number 3. Huckabee echoes the platforms of Tancredo and Hunter, so closely that I thought since he's the most popular of the underdogs he might be the best after all. Then some dirt surfaced. He's not my top pick for the absolute best, but he keeps saying the right things, and he's still in my top 3, if only because nobody else seems to be available...
Huckabee recently got an endorsement from Chuck Norris, on WorldNetDaily, and is still popular there.
So is another 9/11 possible?
Huckabee responds,
"There's almost an inevitability, not just a possibility. It will happen again. And it'll happen because we face an enemy that is not a nation-state that can be contained within borders and boundaries, because their war is not about borders and boundaries. Islamofascism is rooted in a theocratic Islamic jihadism that seeks to destroy and annihilate every last one of us. It wants to establish a complete Islamic theocracy across the world, and for that to happen it means our culture has to be completely snuffed out. There's no peaceful co-existence, there's no accommodation, there's no naïve nonsense that if we leave them alone they leave us alone. This is a war someone will win and someone will lose. Whoever perseveres and whoever has the strongest will, will in fact win, and that's why we can't give up."
He seems to have a good grasp of the situation, and his recent rise to front-runner status is encouraging, but I'm likely going to be keeping my fingers crossed for Hunter all the way. Huckabee might not be the cleanest, but he's not stupid either- and bottom line is, he's still better than the other front-runners... I hope that if he does manage to get in office, he'll choose Hunter (or even Tancredo) as a solid VP.
Labels:
2008,
canditates,
Huckabee,
Hunter,
republicans,
Tancredo
Monday, October 22, 2007
Chuck Norris Lists Reasons to Vote for Huckabee. Thoughts?
EDIT, dirt on Huckabee found: http://sheepdogsblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/dirt-on-huckabee-darn-he-was-too-good.html
He's still cleaner than most front-runners, but I'm just going to have to stick to my guns on Tancredo and Hunter until the final showdown. Sorry Chuck, please don't roundhouse kick me.
-------------------------------------
He makes a very convincing (and logical) argument... of course, he's Chuck Norris! Read the article and make up your own mind. Thoughts?
Previously, I had shared that Huckabee was not strict on immigration, but that was according to some lifted quotes from Coulter. Not saying they weren't credible, but after investigating Huckabee's site, I have to say I'm convinced he's taken a firm stance on securing the border and prosecuting and deporting illegals within our country- and keeping new ones from sneaking in.
His Issue Page- shows where he stands on the war on terror, ditching the IRS, being pro-life, and many other things that should appeal to the modern conservative.
I have my hopes for Tancredo or Hunter, but I'll add Huckabee to my list of acceptable candidates. Who knows, whoever gets it might appoint the others to key positions... that would be great!
However, there come a point when a decision needs made, and we can't have Hillary or Obama, or any of the other leftists... I don't want a RINO getting in either and leading us astray.
I feel that I wouldn't be compromising my integrity to vote for Huckabee. He, like Tancredo and Hunter, is not a CFR member. If enough of the conservatives are willing to back him over Thompson (as people seem more willing to do the more they learn about Thompson), he's probably got the best chance of securing the nomination and being the next president- and no I'm not just saying that because I've been working out on a Total Gym lately.
His issue page (again, go look at it if you haven't by now)
Chuck Norris' Code of Ethics
He's still cleaner than most front-runners, but I'm just going to have to stick to my guns on Tancredo and Hunter until the final showdown. Sorry Chuck, please don't roundhouse kick me.
-------------------------------------
He makes a very convincing (and logical) argument... of course, he's Chuck Norris! Read the article and make up your own mind. Thoughts?
Previously, I had shared that Huckabee was not strict on immigration, but that was according to some lifted quotes from Coulter. Not saying they weren't credible, but after investigating Huckabee's site, I have to say I'm convinced he's taken a firm stance on securing the border and prosecuting and deporting illegals within our country- and keeping new ones from sneaking in.
His Issue Page- shows where he stands on the war on terror, ditching the IRS, being pro-life, and many other things that should appeal to the modern conservative.
I have my hopes for Tancredo or Hunter, but I'll add Huckabee to my list of acceptable candidates. Who knows, whoever gets it might appoint the others to key positions... that would be great!
However, there come a point when a decision needs made, and we can't have Hillary or Obama, or any of the other leftists... I don't want a RINO getting in either and leading us astray.
I feel that I wouldn't be compromising my integrity to vote for Huckabee. He, like Tancredo and Hunter, is not a CFR member. If enough of the conservatives are willing to back him over Thompson (as people seem more willing to do the more they learn about Thompson), he's probably got the best chance of securing the nomination and being the next president- and no I'm not just saying that because I've been working out on a Total Gym lately.
His issue page (again, go look at it if you haven't by now)
Chuck Norris' Code of Ethics
Labels:
2008,
canditates,
Chuck Norris,
Huckabee,
politicians
Friday, September 7, 2007
Media Candidates, Voting, the Future of America!
To fully win freedom and peace we must expel the enemies within our country- that means voting in the right people who will actually do the job... not just voting for someone the media makes look popular- beware!
Look at the background of all the candidates. Continue to ignore what the media is selling. We don't buy their propaganda, so why should we buy the candidates (of either party) they keep pushing? We are the people with the power to determine who gets elected- NOT THEM, so don't just side with the glamorous candidate because you want to be a winner in the eyes of the media or you will be in no better position than the blind and deaf sheep we keep trying to warn of the obvious doom that awaits as a result of trading morality and justice to embrace some politically correct vision for America.
If we stand firm for our principals and are not swayed by the media, we really have a chance! Why not Tancredo? Why not someone who stands firm and will do more than spout platitudes? Why not someone with a clear history and strong convictions? Why be duped by the media with propaganda and a fake popularity contest? Mr. Popular is not going to be Mr. Right when it comes to accomplishing the multiple controversial, risky, and unpopular tasks done that need done to save this country.
Jokes, media soundbites, superficial talk-shows and celebrity followers are not key indicators of the great president we need- if anything they indicate who we should avoid at all costs! Why not pick the sensible candidate the media is purposefully shunning??? You know... the same media that we complain about every day for their lies, propaganda, endangering our troops, leftist bias, attacks on morality, justice, freedom, education, common sense and decency? Why buy a media candidate?
Wouldn't you rather poke the media in the eye and vote for the person you know will do what it takes to save America? If the future and freedom of America really is at stake as many of us keep saying, then we should avoid gambling on any and all of the wolves in sheeps clothing they keep pushing on us!
Personally I'd much rather place my trust and the future of this country in the people purposefully being shunned by the people and their mega-companies who control the media...
As we learned yesterday, NC jumped on board the NAU bandwagon. Do we want a president from either party who will lead us further down that path? We certainly must not jump on celebrity bandwagons! We need to stand firm on the issues we hold dear, for if any of those issues is not firmly held to, it will cost this country dearly.
Look at the background of all the candidates. Continue to ignore what the media is selling. We don't buy their propaganda, so why should we buy the candidates (of either party) they keep pushing? We are the people with the power to determine who gets elected- NOT THEM, so don't just side with the glamorous candidate because you want to be a winner in the eyes of the media or you will be in no better position than the blind and deaf sheep we keep trying to warn of the obvious doom that awaits as a result of trading morality and justice to embrace some politically correct vision for America.
If we stand firm for our principals and are not swayed by the media, we really have a chance! Why not Tancredo? Why not someone who stands firm and will do more than spout platitudes? Why not someone with a clear history and strong convictions? Why be duped by the media with propaganda and a fake popularity contest? Mr. Popular is not going to be Mr. Right when it comes to accomplishing the multiple controversial, risky, and unpopular tasks done that need done to save this country.
Jokes, media soundbites, superficial talk-shows and celebrity followers are not key indicators of the great president we need- if anything they indicate who we should avoid at all costs! Why not pick the sensible candidate the media is purposefully shunning??? You know... the same media that we complain about every day for their lies, propaganda, endangering our troops, leftist bias, attacks on morality, justice, freedom, education, common sense and decency? Why buy a media candidate?
Wouldn't you rather poke the media in the eye and vote for the person you know will do what it takes to save America? If the future and freedom of America really is at stake as many of us keep saying, then we should avoid gambling on any and all of the wolves in sheeps clothing they keep pushing on us!
Personally I'd much rather place my trust and the future of this country in the people purposefully being shunned by the people and their mega-companies who control the media...
As we learned yesterday, NC jumped on board the NAU bandwagon. Do we want a president from either party who will lead us further down that path? We certainly must not jump on celebrity bandwagons! We need to stand firm on the issues we hold dear, for if any of those issues is not firmly held to, it will cost this country dearly.
Labels:
American spirit,
canditates,
freedom,
Media,
media candidates,
voting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)